From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: ATC, an example please.
Date: 30 Jun 2005 16:31:04 -0400
Date: 2005-06-30T16:31:04-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wccfyuztwmv.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: xs87ddydgdmi.11o69y7wom1ur$.dlg@40tude.net
"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
> > But I was under the impression that the original poster wanted to abort
> > the processing inside the accept statement, and allow the task to loop
> > back and accept entry calls again.
>
> Maybe, however it is difficult to see why then there could be any need in
> two tasks. During rendezvous they stay synchronous anyway, so it is better
> to have a subprogram inside the ATC.
Good point. But we don't know how "oversimplified" the original example
was (compared to the real program they were trying to write).
- Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-30 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-30 8:44 ATC, an example please e.coli
2005-06-30 9:32 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2005-06-30 9:59 ` e.coli
2005-06-30 11:06 ` Christoph Grein
2005-06-30 12:55 ` Robert A Duff
2005-06-30 15:29 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2005-06-30 20:31 ` Robert A Duff [this message]
2005-06-30 9:32 ` e.coli
2005-07-02 8:18 ` Craig Carey
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox