From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,86e8c626be2471ae X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,fc050a66c3b5d87d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: F9X twister & ADA (was: n-dim'l vectors) Date: 2000/04/12 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 609883189 Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) References: <8cctts$ujr$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <38EA0440.1ECBC158@ncep.noaa.gov> <38ED4ECA.ADB698C9@sdynamix.com> <38F28A85.53809F39@sdynamix.com> <38F2C1DC.5538F9F0@research.canon.com.au> <5jJI4.297$PV.9915@bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <2000Apr11.135942.1@eisner> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-04-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "James Giles" writes: > In any case, I don't intend to get into a long drawn out argument with > Ada supporters about their favorite language. Well, I'm an Ada supporter who happens to agree with a lot of what you said about exceptions. >... My interest is in what > exception handling might eventually be added to Fortran. It is often > recommended to model the feature on Ada. I think the committee > should consider addressing the shortcomings of Ada as well as its > advantages before just blanket adoption of the feature. Yes. Also look at Java, Eiffel, CLOS, Clu. - Bob