From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,28cd155693714664 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-18 14:17:57 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.abs.net!uunet!dca.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!news From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Faulty languages and Liability Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 21:17:19 GMT References: <3D0C7C0B.5000707@mail.com> <2hgP8.5585$iR2.471553@news.xtra.co.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26309 Date: 2002-06-18T21:17:19+00:00 List-Id: "AG" writes: > Well, not quite. That depends on what claims were made about the locks. Software vendors typically make *no* claims about the proper operation of their product, other than that they will replace physically defective media. The question is whether you can win a lawsuit anyway. - Bob