From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d534ed04fa87be8b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-23 06:00:47 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!newspump.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!newshosting.com!news-xfer1.atl.newshosting.com!uunet!dca.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!news From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Discriminant name must be alone User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 14:00:23 GMT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32231 Date: 2002-12-23T14:00:23+00:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > There is a third answer: "user-defined constructors". What do you mean by "user-defined constructors"? How do they differ from functions? And how do they allow nested constraints to depend upon arbitrary expressions involving discriminants? - Bob