From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d8e86e1b9bb29940 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: "autocode" vs "intermediate code" Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:10:35 -0500 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <2007021717413416807-rblove@airmailnet> <366ma4-3m6.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com> <2007021920150816807-rblove@airmailnet> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1171991435 6917 192.74.137.71 (20 Feb 2007 17:10:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:10:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:2VHvGdRAf5qbqQeVpZoBw8k3FG0= Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:9369 Date: 2007-02-20T12:10:35-05:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake writes: > The proper question is whether the Ada original source for the > navigation is more readable than the MatrixX original source for the > GNC. Another proper question is: To what extent does one need to look at the generated Ada code for analysis/understanding/debugging/etc? If the answer is "not at all", then you don't need to care how readable the Ada code is. I don't know anything about MatrixX... - Bob