From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7d3cb5920e882220
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Exceptions
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:15:32 -0500
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wccejdql5az.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: 
 <5947aa62-2547-4fbb-bc46-1111b4a0dcc9@x69g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
 <bfea7c31-a6d8-420c-8ba3-8a2df7749253@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 <m2k5nqib4y.fsf@mac.com> <wccsl2b1r0j.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <475c6ed8$0$13111$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <1kxk3hlfa25dw$.fl2wvbn0tpbg$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <475d296a$0$27813$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi>
 <12mjar2f2t2e6$.o2upq0n29j1f.dlg@40tude.net>
 <475d99c6$0$3520$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi>
 <1x0h6yxp9rhy1.1thonmo9cmwy3$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <475e8bde$0$27850$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi> <fjn886$c53$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
 <wcctzmonfmn.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <fjs0fb$cev$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1197576932 29023 192.74.137.71 (13 Dec 2007 20:15:32
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:15:32 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TC5GNrvIjnL8mTguc6bGLgcoOk0=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18931
Date: 2007-12-13T15:15:32-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:

> Right, but in that case we *still* wouldn't need formal exceptions, because
> formal objects would serve just as well. Which really was my point - no
> sense in adding more cruft for that.

Exactly!  The desire for generic formal exceptions is a symptom of the
problem, to which first-class exceptions are the obvious clean
solution.

- Bob