From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,81bb2ce65a3240c3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.230.98 with SMTP id sx2mr9414538pbc.1.1335707002075;
        Sun, 29 Apr 2012 06:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 r9ni112158pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!panix!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What would you like in Ada202X?
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:43:21 -0400
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wccehr6hcw6.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <3637793.35.1335340026327.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynfi5>
 <4f97bf40$0$6559$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <jn9f2o$g98$1@tornado.tornevall.net> <op.wdb9nm14ule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <jn9pjs$b8a$1@tornado.tornevall.net> <op.wdcbcfmcule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <jn9u73$mao$1@tornado.tornevall.net> <op.wdckmcyzule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <7039631.627.1335610937700.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbxz8>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1335707001 807 192.74.137.71 (29 Apr 2012 13:43:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:43:21 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lsgfuOJd9arQimda7I6Dz8F7ASg=
X-Received-Bytes: 1755
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-04-29T09:43:21-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

okellogg@users.sourceforge.net writes:

> Which reminds me to refresh another longstanding wish:
> Allow child packages of nested packages as described at
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!msg/comp.lang.ada/RHhA1CpYDcA/ArR1n1HgFRoJ

Ideally, nested packages and child packages would have
identical semantics.  Switching from one to the other
would not change anything.  That's almost, but not quite,
true, and your suggestion above is one example where
it's not true.

- Bob