From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,672b169dc220673a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.234.38 with SMTP id ub6mr23860564pbc.2.1337619938796;
        Mon, 21 May 2012 10:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 pr3ni21436pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Vector (container) initialization: the schizophrenic ampersand
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 13:04:30 -0400
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wccehqd4g9t.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <10616734.43.1337286031745.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbjy7>
 <70510fa1-e554-44a7-9364-e745674c1bda@googlegroups.com>
 <28845c63-b06c-4ac2-b5d5-e408c0ff4b7f@googlegroups.com>
 <wcc7gw9ipio.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <70817af5-96c3-4ca7-8d1c-b7635452bf4c@googlegroups.com>
 <wccy5oof8pb.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <890b49f0-ae6d-4807-8ca3-4c4b98ca7ed6@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1337619870 31661 192.74.137.71 (21 May 2012 17:04:30
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:04:30 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4q63HzG55Es5Vi4JnrOnLVWO2GQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-05-21T13:04:30-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com> writes:

> On Saturday, May 19, 2012 9:15:44 AM UTC-7, Robert A Duff wrote:
>
>> You don't need to qualify everything.  Just enough to disambiguate.
>> I don't know what operators are visible in this example,
>> nor what the context is, but this should work:
>> 
>>     T'(Element1 & Element2 & Element3)
>
> Sorry, it won't work.

Hmm.  You're probably right.  I'm not sure, because I haven't
seen what "&" operators we're talking about, nor what
the context is (is the concatenation assigned into
a variable, passed to an overloaded procedure, ...?).

- Bob