From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4751d44ff54a2c2c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-31 15:00:20 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!uunet!lax.uu.net!sac.uu.net!sea.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!news From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: 64-bit integers in Ada Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 21:59:49 GMT References: <3CE3978F.6070704@gmx.spam.egg.sausage.and.spam.net> <3D46DC69.7C291297@adaworks.com> <5ee5b646.0207301613.5b59616c@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27539 Date: 2002-07-31T21:59:49+00:00 List-Id: Keith Thompson writes: > Robert A Duff writes: > [...] > > Actually, Ada requires 16 bit integers (at minimum). > > You're right, I had forgotten that. > > It also implicitly requires support for at least 24-bit fixed-point > (see the requirements for type Duration, 9.6(27)). ...which is kind of silly. Why would an implementation want to support less for integers than for fixed? - Bob