From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b16c9883f36bc904 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: WinNT ADA compilers comparison Date: 2000/08/04 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 654406553 Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) References: <3976C68A.12386D00@cadwin.com> <8l7fff$9kb$1@front1.grolier.fr> <3A92E737.E690906A@free.fr> <3978041A.EB0F8FCE@cadwin.com> <8lcgbi$gvb$1@front5.grolier.fr> <397C03F9.AF6DF60F@cadwin.com> <86zon5aio7.fsf@acm.org> <8m8psc$ef6$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8m9a08$pu7$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8mak9p$rbm$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-08-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Brian Rogoff writes: > Robert Dewar mentioned that there is a DEC patent on generic sharing which > implementors had to be cautious of. Find the date it was issued, and add > 17 to get an idea of when we might hear talk of a generic sharing GNAT ;-) First of all, the DEC patent covers just one method of generic code sharing. Second of all, there is prior art on that particular method. - Bob