From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,78b2880bc7e78e39 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-17 01:38:53 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: nntp.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsengine.sol.net!newspump.sol.net!nntp.msen.com!uunet!ash.uu.net!world!bobduff From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: RISC Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:28:05 GMT References: <98qumf$5sf$1@nh.pace.co.uk> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 Xref: nntp.stanford.edu comp.lang.ada:91492 Date: 2001-03-15T18:28:05+00:00 List-Id: "Marin David Condic" writes: > To make matters worse, a compiler is free in general to refuse to accept > *any* representation clause - You Can't Always Get What You Want.... True, but don't all compilers these days support the SP annex, which requires a fair amount of support for rep clauses? Anyway, in practise, "for Byte_Object'Size use 8;" will probably be accepted by every compiler for every 8-bit-byte-addressable machine, and will work as you expect. It's just the 'Size on subtypes that has "questionable" semantics. - Bob