From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e5bfa021bc026369
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-27 10:14:00 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Personality Conflict was: why Ada is so unpopular ?
Date: 27 Jan 2004 13:13:58 -0500
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wccbropz2c9.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <401524D4.CBDA0658@mitre.org>
 <mailman.20.1075131072.2270.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <101at48fggcated@corp.supernews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pip1-5.std.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1075227238 27953 192.74.137.185 (27 Jan 2004 18:13:58
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:13:58 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4917
Date: 2004-01-27T13:13:58-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:

> Right. The OP seems to be assuming that Ada = GNAT, which certainly is not
> true. (The folks at Rational, Aonix, ICC, DDCI, Green Hills, and RRS would
> certainly object to such a characterization. [Apologies to anyone I left
> out.]) ...

SofCheck, Inc.

- Bob