From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b0d569080889afd6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: A question for my personal knowledge.
Date: 1999/05/12
Message-ID: <wccaevae4ui.fsf@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 477024009
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
References: <1VEZ2.1515$I51.88140@carnaval.risq.qc.ca>
 <37372A84.641F2133@bigfoot.com> <7h8oe8$2js$1@cf01.edf.fr>
 <37382B0C.A95B6745@bigfoot.com> <7h9o21$9v4$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <37387BC6.D1737672@bigfoot.com>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-05-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Roy Grimm <ragrimm@bigfoot.com> writes:

> I think it really boils down to the attitude of the individual.  They
> can either shape the language around their attitude or they can shape
> their attitude around the language. ...

The former isn't always a bad idea.  Eg, when programming in C, use .h
files in a very stylized way that indicates the "spec" vs
"implementation".

- Bob
-- 
Change robert to bob to get my real email address.  Sorry.