From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7e29322ee367c19d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Wrap-Up (was Re: Unchecked_Conversion on different sized types
 	 -- problem?)
Date: 2000/01/15
Message-ID: <wccaem7cb3o.fsf@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 573098497
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
References: <qXpf4.429$dw3.15200@news.wenet.net>
 <qaIf4.469$dw3.16808@news.wenet.net>
 <ETSf4.273$541.8047@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-01-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Matthew Heaney" <matthew_heaney@acm.org> writes:

> Compilar writers: if we use a little function to call the allocator, ie
> 
>   function "+" (S : String) return String_Access is
>   begin
>     return new String'(S);
>   end;
> 
>   Table : constant String_Table :=
>     (A => +"this is a test",
>      B => +"of the emergency",
>      C => +"broadcast sytsem");
> begin
> 
> then is the allocation still done statically?

My guess is: Yes, if "+" has a pragma Inline, otherwise no.

- Bob