From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7f4d16c4ee371eb5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Why is it Called a Package? Date: 2000/04/08 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 608446017 Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) References: <38DF7F38.8D656ABD@lmtas.lmco.com> <38DFB0BC.9FF72EFC@callnetuk.com> <87u2hq857e.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org> <38E2A4A4.E59E997C@research.canon.com.au> <8ck2mt$jrn$1@clnews.edf.fr> <38EE19E0.F0232DB0@Raytheon.com> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-04-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Brian Rogoff writes: > I think its unfortunate that anything connected with C or C++ causes such > a reaction in Ada fans. Consider that for most programmers Ada elicits a > similar knee-jerk response. I agree, but for this particular case: the A[I] syntax is the way Pascal does it, too. - Bob