From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,77f1de37204ed8a6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-03 13:16:33 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!howland.erols.net!portc.blue.aol.com.MISMATCH!portc01.blue.aol.com!uunet!dca.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!bobduff
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Operator visibility question
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Message-ID: <wccae3pfhge.fsf@world.std.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 20:15:29 GMT
References: <ba18d5cb.0106030548.62aa45e2@posting.google.com>
	<3b1a5cb5_4@news.arrakis.es>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8043
Date: 2001-06-03T20:15:29+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Nacho Robledo" <rrilNOSPAMpm@arrakis.es> writes:

> I am not a good ada programmer but try this piece of code:
> 
>     C: constant Boolean := MT."<"(A+2,B);

No, please don't.  A good style rule is to never use this notation -- if
you have a binary operator, always use infix notation.  Say "use type"
if necessary to make that legal.

> I am not sure if this will run well but i think is the most common thing you
> can do....

- Bob