From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,52fd60a337c05842 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-15 15:53:10 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.abs.net!uunet!dca.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!news From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: ada paper critic Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 22:52:43 GMT References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26044 Date: 2002-06-15T22:52:43+00:00 List-Id: "Gautier no_direct_reply_please" writes: > Let's add that this not the typical style or a required syntax > of Ada, but bad habits of programmers who were accustomed > to punched cards, capital letters, PDP-8 machines and were > resticted to program in FORTRAN-66 or C in their youth. ALL_CAPS *was* the recommended style for Ada 83. So it doesn't go back to punch cards and the like. Fortunately, in Ada 95, the recommended style is Not_All_Caps. - Bob