From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,39f3c359196fe8b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-20 12:39:36 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsgate.duke.edu!newsfeed!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: for x'address or variant Date: 20 Apr 2003 15:39:36 -0400 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1050867576 26237 199.172.62.241 (20 Apr 2003 19:39:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 19:39:36 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36324 Date: 2003-04-20T15:39:36-04:00 List-Id: "kat-Zygfryd" <6667@wp.pl> writes: > If you say so, I just thought that using a component > would be at least an instruction or two faster than > indexing an array ... Than indexing an array by a static index value? I doubt it. Seems like you ought to prove (by measuring, and reading the assembly code) that this is a real problem before you start playing low-level games like this for efficiency reasons. - Bob