From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e7d9fee9b42cd34e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Not null feature with anonymous and named access types Date: 17 Jun 2006 10:25:36 -0400 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <1150144396.104055.164310@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1150554337 1841 192.74.137.71 (17 Jun 2006 14:25:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:25:37 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4807 Date: 2006-06-17T10:25:36-04:00 List-Id: "Randy Brukardt" writes: > (But the important use of "not null" is in passing parameters.) Yes. And function results. Too bad we couldn't make "not null" be the default... - Bob