From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9cccf6ef6149fdaa
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Operators -> unit analysis
Date: 2000/01/06
Message-ID: <wcc9022izjp.fsf@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 569291851
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
References: <38620350.48F8FC08@gecm.com>
 <84thof$9r3$1@nntp4.atl.mindspring.net> <387383D0.4EA02E95@earthlink.net>
 <850tl9$thu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8531v6$6qk$1@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-01-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

tsikes@netcom.com (Terry Sikes) writes:

> Was this point argued at length after the decision was made to add the
> various annexes?

Yes.

>...I'd think that this would be better received if it
> was tied to the Numerics annex, since certainly this would be the
> major area of use.

Perhaps, but most numerics code is done in Fortran, and it doesn't
bother with all this fancy stuff either.

- Bob