From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,66bc6b039f1e005d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Three simple questions
Date: 2000/10/16
Message-ID: <wcc7l7893ia.fsf@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 682105611
Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
References: 
 <2BED68CA963D6D55.A78776F656DA0452.75A61ED22116F1B6@lp.airnews.net>
 <39E47BAC.8DB1AD0B@acm.org> <lSXF5.3$0K1.302@typhoon.nyu.edu>
 <86aec7tl59.fsf@acm.org>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-10-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Laurent Guerby <guerby@acm.org> writes:

> kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) writes:
> > [...] Some would say this argues in favor of underscores not being
> > significant either, so you couldn't have a disinct Roll_Control
> > variable either, but "roll underscore control" sounds a lot smoother
> > than saying "each cycle we set the capital r roll capital c control
> > variable from the average of the lower-case r roll lower-case c
> > control, lower-case r roll capital c control, and capital r roll
> > lower-case c control variables"!
> 
> Nice example ;-).

I don't buy it.  I find it impossible to chat about programs of any
substantial size without writing them down -- that's what whiteboards
are for.

> As for underscores, if you put them consistently between words, you
> don't even need to mention them while discussing your program. And
> since Ada identifiers cannot begin with, have two consecutive or end
> with an underscore, there's no problem at all.

The same is true of casing -- if you use sensible conventions, case
sensitivity doesn't damage talking.  Eg, you might have "the type FOO",
and "the variable foo".

I still think case sensitivity is error prone.

> Note that this issue transcend programming languages and goes up to
> the more general human-computer interface field. ...

Reminds of a user-interface I heard of that used the C convention, where
an integer literal starting with "0" is octal.  It's bad enough in a
programming language, but to foist that on unsuspecting (non-programmer)
users is pretty horrible.

- Bob