From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8b8f4ad9d302b143 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-31 09:21:22 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada loops Date: 31 May 2003 12:21:21 -0400 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1054398081 12344 199.172.62.241 (31 May 2003 16:21:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 16:21:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38223 Date: 2003-05-31T12:21:21-04:00 List-Id: "chris.danx" writes: > Simon Wright wrote: > > >>There is no version of gdb that is Ada aware. > > I don't understand, clearly you're making a point but I have no idea > > what it is. > > Perhaps it is that there is no Ada aware gdb, but there is a GNAT aware > gdb? I tend to associate debuggers with implementations not languages, > but I could be wrong... No, I was not complaining that the gdb distributed with GNAT is GNAT-specific. That's to be expected. I was complaining that it is not as "Ada aware" as the Ada compiler. - Bob