From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,92f1b9f519795959
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsread.com!news-xfer.newsread.com!news-feed01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net!nntp.frontiernet.net!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Gnat 3.15p pragma issues
Date: 03 Nov 2005 18:00:17 -0500
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wcc7jbpgwvy.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <1131029395.700984.154230@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1131058817 25713 192.74.137.71 (3 Nov 2005 23:00:17
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:00:17 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6162
Date: 2005-11-03T18:00:17-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Erik Woulfe" <DMBTonic@AOL.com> writes:

> I am attempting to move a large amount of code from an Apex compiler
> system to the Gnat 3.15p compiler in order to gain more flexibility in
> mutli-language code interaction (namely between C++ and Ada). One of
> the problems that I encounter when making this move is that the Gnat
> compiler does not recognize many of the pragma statements that Apex had
> no problems with. However, I do not think that any/all of these are
> Apex specific, such as pragma "Inline" and pragma "Not_Elaborated". Has
> anyone had any experience with having common pragmas not being
> recognized?

Pragma Inline is defined by the language.  Not_Elaborated is
implementation defined.  There is a list of language-defined pragmas in
the back of the RM.  To know whether it's safe to simply delete
implementation-defined pragmas, you'll have to look at the Apex
documentation.  Some pragmas are "merely" optimization hints,
for example.

>... Am I perhaps not referencing the correct libraries in my
> gnatmake call?

No, that probably has nothing to do with it.

- Bob