From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c32f54b2230c68d7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Compilers for VAX Was: Ada version of C's 'static' Date: 1999/08/09 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 510595150 Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) References: <7n03us$862$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3798EDE9.90B9623B@averstar.com> <1999Aug6.130439.1@eisner> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-08-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) writes: > Was I incorrect in that impression, or are you saying the machine on > which it was validated was VAX/VMS ? No, it's not validated on the VAX -- sorry if I said something misleading. It's validated on sun/sparc using the gcc C compiler as the back end, and on the ADI SHARC dsp chip (cross compiler from Windows 95/NT). If you want it ported to VAX/VMS, talk to Tucker at AverStar (stt@averstar.com). The main point of having a C-generating Ada compiler is to make it easy to port -- but it's not zero work. - Bob -- Change robert to bob to get my real email address. Sorry.