From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5037bf0bb33408c8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-09 12:47:09 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!uunet!ash.uu.net!world!news
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Subject: Re: "&" for array versus "&" for Strings
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself)
Message-ID: <wcc65wb4cqh.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:46:14 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References: <mailman.1034185082.23700.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29639
Date: 2002-10-09T19:46:14+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Steven Deller" <deller@smsail.com> writes:

> > There is no aggregate in this example.
> > 
> > There are two string_literals, and RM-4.2(4) says "...single 
> > string type".  So I think this one should resolve OK.
> 
> Yep.  FYI, Apex 4.2 yields the expected result:
> 
> ---- execute of /home/ctdellsr/apex/testpp.ss/prime.wrk/array_test
> 
>  1: Ada   
>  2: Babbel

Cool.  Compilers don't "define" the language, but the fact this one
particular compiler agrees with my interpretation is some evidence
indicating I wasn't totally off the wall.  ;-)

- Bob

P.S. I haven't tried this example with our own (SofCheck's) AdaMagic
compilers.