From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,5f5a48f21d7f7525
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!198.186.194.249.MISMATCH!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!panix!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Inferring array index type from array object
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:17:22 -0400
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wcc6319act9.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: 
 <6b20ed09-efc1-4df7-90f9-5e141482e8d0@d37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
 <1305oqccr1h2t$.x33x4oxwd84d$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <hvsikv$3a7$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <wcc63194xvu.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <hvt8jb$v7g$1@news.eternal-september.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1277313437 19271 192.74.137.71 (23 Jun 2010 17:17:17
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:17:17 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5mgjBBeqZnWYEROaMEtqi1nW2ns=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11895
Date: 2010-06-23T13:17:22-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr> writes:

> Not yet, although it would be a very simple addition. The hardest part
> would be to find an acceptable name for the rule. The current one is:
>
> check declarations (anonymous_subtype_for);
>
> and I wouldn't like:
> check declarations (anonymous_subtype_except_range_for);
> ;-)

I'd suggest something like "default_integer_range".  It's not just
for 'for' loops -- the same language malfeature occurs for array
type decls, for example.

- Bob