From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,2a34b7ad6c6a0774 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Efficiency of code generated by Ada compilers Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:42:27 -0400 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <1jmwhfp.roo31ybayx2bN%csampson@inetworld.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: pcls4.std.com 1281390133 24547 192.74.137.71 (9 Aug 2010 21:42:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 21:42:13 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:hKg1WOyqIkXeMP/AetXCHBARXCk= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13022 Date: 2010-08-09T17:42:27-04:00 List-Id: "Yannick Duch�ne (Hibou57)" writes: > Le Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:28:02 +0200, Robert A Duff > a �crit: >>> Hmmm... Hash coded tables? >> >> Signed integers work fine for that. Except when you need >> that one extra bit -- that's the problem. > > All of the hash functions I have seen so far use modular types. Do you > known ones computing on integers ? Modular types are integer types in Ada terms. So that should be "...computing on SIGNED integers". Sorry for nitpicking. ;-) Well, all the ones I wrote in Ada 83, or Pascal, or... used signed integers. But I concede the point -- modular types are appropriate for hash functions. - Bob