From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8143b93889fe9472
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.66.86.198 with SMTP id r6mr286727paz.36.1359492795386;
        Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:53:15 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 s9ni24604pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!panix!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada standard and maximum line lengths
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:53:14 -0500
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Message-ID: <wcc622f90ed.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <8dfcf819-e1d0-4578-a795-a4bf724b5014@googlegroups.com>
 <80a5c765-e5ff-4e7d-bc1b-e35f92a710a7@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1359492795 16453 192.74.137.71 (29 Jan 2013 20:53:15
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:53:15 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:glZLaIzsy/ImWpAWVYnGLuIkQGY=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2013-01-29T15:53:14-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com> writes:

> So, in short, I'm wondering whether it really matters to parse by
> breaking up into lines or not.

There's no reason why breaking into lines should be separate from
lexical analysis (i.e. scanning).

- Bob