From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Package formal parameter visibility Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:47:50 -0400 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <7f095a51-f906-47b6-ac21-a8e07dc46726@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell02.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: pcls7.std.com 1490564870 14064 192.74.137.72 (26 Mar 2017 21:47:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 21:47:50 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z1Gx/UZwMOpiX9+gFPsu9ePcyzk= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:46476 Date: 2017-03-26T17:47:50-04:00 List-Id: Jere writes: > If I use A as a formal parameter into another package, I suddenly get > visibility of A's formal parameters in that new package. Yes, formal packages are treated differently. If you want to know the exact rules, and why, read AARM-12.7(10-10.b). - Bob