From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,78b2880bc7e78e39 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-19 09:48:11 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!news-reader.ntrnet.net!uunet!ash.uu.net!world!bobduff From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: RISC Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:45:44 GMT References: <98tt7g$88h$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <995e4m$n90$1@nh.pace.co.uk> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5860 Date: 2001-03-19T17:45:44+00:00 List-Id: "Marin David Condic" writes: > Exceptions can be viewed as a sort of "limited/controlled goto" - and as > such they can pose hazards to good software design. I'd say it's the other way around: goto's are more limited that raising an exception, because with a goto, you can tell statically where you're going to, whereas an exception is a goto to a dynamically determined label. - Bob