From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,57f8540942f8e060 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Initialization and Finalization of limited object "returned" by a function Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 14:45:05 -0500 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <41b794ec-26b0-485e-a959-580a5b877a3b@f15g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <8e09c20d-172e-42a2-b2ff-994863893523@h12g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <9c2b5c56-7abf-4523-844d-b48447587402@w27g2000pre.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1266090291 20740 192.74.137.71 (13 Feb 2010 19:44:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:44:50 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NfG4+DQbYXJ3K/UOL8fEnSrOiFY= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9202 Date: 2010-02-13T14:45:05-05:00 List-Id: "Hibou57 (Yannick Duch�ne)" writes: > So that's to be added with the other project I've heard about here at > comp.lang.ada, about first-class-functions (it was during the thread > about making constant declarations overloadable if my mind is right) > and the pre-post-condition discussed here and on fr.c.l.a. > > As Santa Claus seems to be actually checking orders, do you know if > there will be something like co-routines ? We already have tasks, but > tasks are a bit too much heavy as co-routines. No, probably not. Probably no first-class functions, either. - Bob