From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,af0c6ea85f3ed92d X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.226.10 with SMTP id ro10mr19285747pbc.6.1329858237789; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:03:57 -0800 (PST) Path: wr5ni52633pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!panix!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Arbitrary Sandbox Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:03:57 -0500 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1329858237 21026 192.74.137.71 (21 Feb 2012 21:03:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:03:57 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0LyAHlB75G1rO3YbYjp9OCPd+9I= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: 2012-02-21T16:03:57-05:00 List-Id: tmoran@acm.org writes: >> > We've spent the last half-century making computers faster, with modest, >> > or sometimes negative, progress on preventing or catching software bugs, >> > so the number of executed bugs/second must be orders of magnitude larger. >> >> Certainly true. There are also a lot more car wrecks nowadays than >> there were 100 years ago. ;-) > > The fatalities/vehicle mile have decreased by roughly one order of > magnitude. I can believe it. I know driving has gotten safer in the U.S. since I learned to drive (more recently than 100 years ago). Sorry, I didn't mean for my silly joke to cause an off-topic discussion about cars. >...Have the number of bugs/line of code done a lot better? Probably not. But note that the move almost entirely away from assembly language reduced the number of lines of code needed for a given functionality. So we had to increase the amount of useless functionality to make up for that. ;-) - Bob