From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,cef1e23795181e0c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Alternate to Unchecked_Conversion - Portable? Date: 1999/02/26 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 448787410 Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) References: <36d05e39.0@news.pacifier.com> <36d2638e.6427631@nntp.concentric.net> <7avpi0$jke$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36d3ba85.713118@nntp.concentric.net> <7b2l6s$vu3$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36d50d18.695962@nntp.concentric.net> <7b3glh$ml6$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-02-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com writes: > A mantra that should be central to every programmer's > view of the universe is: > > "just because it works does not mean it is right" > > A lot of programmers violate this because they don't know > enough to avoid violations. And the rest of us violate this by accident. - Bob -- Change robert to bob to get my real email address. Sorry.