From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fd63afa4dc364b7e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-27 06:28:31 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!nntp.msen.com!uunet!ash.uu.net!world!bobduff From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: Static typing (Was Re: Better support for garbage collection) Sender: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:23:00 GMT References: <98m938$2iod0$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de><98pgs1$32up7$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de><98umc6$39coj$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <3ABFFD67.6EBDA7B@votehere.net> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:6110 Date: 2001-03-27T14:23:00+00:00 List-Id: "Ken Garlington" writes: > True. The more correct notation would be 0.1E0 (or, some would probably > argue, 1.0E-1). This would certainly make it easier to tell whether the > number was intended to be fixed-point or floating point. The "E" notation is legal for floating point, fixed point, and integer literals. Are you saying it should only be allowed for floating point?! - Bob