From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a5449b9a03812b50 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-28 15:02:17 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.tufts.edu!uunet!dca.uu.net!ash.uu.net!world!news From: Robert A Duff Subject: Re: GNAT documentation question Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 22:01:48 GMT References: <3D417AB2.ADDD3F7A@boeing.com> <5ee5b646.0207281109.3894cc74@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27438 Date: 2002-07-28T22:01:48+00:00 List-Id: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes: > By the way, it seems that this particular documentation > requirement got omitted from Annex M, which is probably > an oversight. I created the contents of Annex M, so the fact that this one is missing is my fault. I was always against having Annex M in the first place, and against any form of documentation requirements, so it might be the case that I was (therefore) sloppy. (I am very much in favor of good documentation -- I just don't think an International Standard is the way to go about it.) - Bob