From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,699cc914522aa7c4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!198.186.194.247.MISMATCH!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!panix!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nntp.TheWorld.com!not-for-mail From: Robert A Duff Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Structured exception information Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:02:22 -0500 Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Message-ID: References: <19m5bhhcnh423$.dlvfewj3onxc.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: shell01.theworld.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: pcls6.std.com 1169492542 30185 192.74.137.71 (22 Jan 2007 19:02:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@TheWorld.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:02:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (irix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+wTbTuSIeav7OrH4d30Vn/Gypj4= Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8402 Date: 2007-01-22T14:02:22-05:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:51:22 -0500, Robert A Duff wrote: > >> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: >> >>> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 17:07:18 -0500, Robert A Duff wrote: >>> >>>> The truth is, the interactions between exceptions and finalization are >>>> nasty, and hard to get right. >>> >>> Yes. I wondering, isn't it the *same* problem as with Storage_Error? >> >> Please remind me which Storage_Error problem we're talking about. >> >> There are language problems with Storage_Error (you can't know what data >> was half-baked at the point of running out of memory). But perhaps >> you're referring to something else? > > It was about handling S_E. If I remember correctly it was a thread a year > or so ago, in which you started to talk about some alternative, about how > it could/should be done, but then stopped yourself with usual mantra "that > would not be Ada." (:-)) OK, I was probably talking about this: ...you can't know what data was half-baked at the point of running out of memory. - Bob