From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:29:09 -0500
Subject: Re: The answer to "Can Ada replace FORTRAN for numerical computation?
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <qh3ejl$fle$1@gioia.aioe.org> <lyzhl662f4.fsf@pushface.org>
 <4ba1579b-a096-483d-8f7a-9028a419d643@googlegroups.com>
 <lyv9vu5hpv.fsf@pushface.org>
 <28590d5c-d5f0-4322-9aa4-e1bb92419db3@googlegroups.com>
 <qhaqin$t2l$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <Pr2dndOY_cmvEcjAnZ2dnUU7-VXNnZ2d@giganews.com> <qj4ahc$cml$1@gioia.aioe.org>
From: Norman Worth <nworth@comcastNOSPAM.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 12:29:08 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <qj4ahc$cml$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <waqdnSAnraloaMvAnZ2dnUU7-IOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: 
 sv3-ceNcQZ9iDo54OzRD33MAw0JrWi5ro9Y9CFbciXc7YSGFB3RtVLqBsPILDa+r7h18gNSWGWZw2HR2LY7!ei/5k3WJkTL3k3u/V6ZtZ7GE0u0M2x1BFbTqS29BTNipC7drZR8BW01H28MsdptwtjAF4CsnXRWq
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2019
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:57067
Date: 2019-08-16T12:29:08-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> On 2019-08-15 18:45, Norman Worth wrote:
> 
>> I agree that arrays would probably work better as containers, but 
>> array slices are very handy in a number of cases when you need to copy 
>> part of an array or restrict the view of the array.  But then slices 
>> would probably work better as container functions too.
> 
> Rather containers would work better as arrays and slices of like String 
> vs Unbounded_String.
> 
Of course we can have (and sometimes do have) arrays of containers.