From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3cd94a799504cebd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-17 03:52:39 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Small question concerning use
Date: 17 Oct 2001 05:52:30 -0500
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <wXrJpefhQrXs@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <9qi8ls$a2g1@news.cis.okstate.edu>
 <t74z7.24113$gT6.15012072@news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com>
 <3BCCF185.A4512DDA@san.rr.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1003315956 3510 192.135.80.34 (17 Oct 2001
 10:52:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:52:36 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14791
Date: 2001-10-17T05:52:30-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3BCCF185.A4512DDA@san.rr.com>, Darren New <dnew@san.rr.com> writes:
> tmoran@acm.org wrote:
>> OTOH, Ada.Streams.Stream_Element_Count was clearly designed with the
>> intention of "use Ada.Streams", in which case Stream_Element_Count
>> is very readable, while Ada.Streams.Stream_Element_Count is ugly.
> 
> Right. My thought was that "always avoid use - it leads to ambiguities"
> is too sweeping a statement in the face of this sort of naming
> convention.

That is why not everybody supports that statement.