From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,272a6cffd0aaf0b0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-28 15:12:06 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.uchicago.edu!newsfeed.cs.wisc.edu!newsfeed.mathworks.com!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!4.24.21.153!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Question about Adabas Date: 28 Jan 2003 17:11:50 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <3fdjg-em3.ln1@beastie.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1043795470 7046 192.135.80.34 (28 Jan 2003 23:11:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 23:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33524 Date: 2003-01-28T17:11:50-06:00 List-Id: In article <3fdjg-em3.ln1@beastie.ix.netcom.com>, Dennis Lee Bieber writes: > Of course, between then and now, anything goes (I'm sure Adabas went > from some sort of confused access system to relational ). Don't be too sure of yourself on that. According to my wife, who has it at work, the Natural language used to access Adabas has no relational queries.