From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,577c9f9c0cdd76d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tmoran@bix.com Subject: Y2K liability, was Re: Confusing language, was Re: Help help.. please.i am totaly new in ada programing Date: 1999/11/09 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 546593199 References: <808mrr$eul2@ftp.kvaerner.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net X-Trace: typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net 942180444 206.170.2.27 (Tue, 09 Nov 1999 12:47:24 PST) Organization: SBC Internet Services NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 12:47:24 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-11-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >I'm pretty sure that any vendor who have released software that is >supposed to be used after 1999 will find himself in trouble if he tries to >charge extra for y2k fixes. Perhaps, but how much software explicitly guaranteed that it could be used after 1999? How much explicitly said instead there were not even implied warranties of fitness for any purpose ...