From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbbb936609f82bbd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-09 12:03:41 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.204!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!sccrnsc01.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Time_Span and Hardware resolutions
References: <at2auk$fjf$1@newstoo.ericsson.se>
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Message-ID: <wG6J9.294847$NH2.20523@sccrnsc01>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56
X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com
X-Trace: sccrnsc01 1039464220 12.234.13.56 (Mon, 09 Dec 2002 20:03:40 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 20:03:40 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 20:03:40 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:31598
Date: 2002-12-09T20:03:40+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> I have a Ada.Real_Time.Time_Span parameter as an in parameter to a
> procedure.
>...
> If I get 37 milliseconds as a parameter I must convert the value of that to
> be in steps of 100 us (microseconds).
How about:
  function Hardware_Ticks(T : in Ada.Real_Time.Time_Span) return Integer is
  begin
    return T/Ada.Real_Time.Microseconds(100);
  end Hardware_Ticks;
or the obvious changes to round up instead of truncate.