From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d17f9c8d910b90f6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trndny05.POSTED!da342007!not-for-mail From: "stephane richard" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <7MJ0d.103131$dP1.369128@newsc.telia.net> Subject: Re: Microsoft & Ada X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response Message-ID: Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 23:11:24 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.44.73.165 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trndny05 1094944284 129.44.73.165 (Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:11:24 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:11:24 EDT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3599 Date: 2004-09-11T23:11:24+00:00 List-Id: >"Bj�rn Persson" wrote in message >news:7MJ0d.103131As Ludovic said the >reference manual is copyrighted but >that doesn't matter. The only thing I can think of that could force anyone >to keep their compiler compatible is if the name "Ada" is a trademark that >you may use only if your compiler passes the validation tests. >Is it a trademark? Somebody ought to know. I've looked and I simply can't find Ada(tm) so far. I would have to assume it isn't but I'll leave that to those that really do know ;-)