From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6d79efdb8dde2c5a X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.84.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed-fusi2.netcologne.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: Categories for SPARK on Rosetta Code (Was: SPARK : third example for Roesetta - reviewers welcome) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <4c69a251$0$2371$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net> <4c69cd5f$0$2375$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net> <1ddee5a6-fc25-4d23-bebd-3364923d0aa5@z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <7cf71c68-4faf-4a7b-a350-405ff7f12ff9@z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4xb6sjkpzo1r$.138841gile5s0$.dlg@40tude.net> <87wrrnjf9f.fsf_-_@hugsarin.sparre-andersen.dk> <3ed38f7f-372d-422e-9bda-eca8a73d3f0d@x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <1ncf62lqqj7ab$.1czxyaw96dl17.dlg@40tude.net> <1y0wcz3etd5au.1kgyc5ls0w5kk$.dlg@40tude.net> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:41:19 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Aug 2010 18:41:15 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: cdbf03b3.newsspool1.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=@nNY:HWQE@nJ00P1S40fZgic==]BZ:afn4Fo<]lROoRa<`=YMgDjhgbRUbKm`amj0n[6LHn;2LCVn[ On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:23:32 +0200, J-P. Rosen wrote: > Le 20/08/2010 16:05, Dmitry A. Kazakov a �crit : >> I thought about a specific approach to programming, as it was proposed by >> Dijkstra, with designing both the program and a proof that certain >> properties of the program hold. SPARK's annotations support this approach. >> This is not specific to SPARK. >> > Good - and I still think that Eiffel could claim that to a certain > extent, and also Ada with Pre/Post condition. Not to me. > Now, do you have a name for it? No. Maybe by analogy to TDD (test-driven design): proof-driven design support -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de