From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,64c375eca99d686e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,1ec99b0df63ed9ca
X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public
From: gale@wind.hpc.pko.dec.com (Israel Gale)
Subject: Re: Object-oriented Fortran vs. Ada 95?
Date: 1996/02/20
Message-ID: <w3l4tsmaq9k.fsf@wind.hpc.pko.dec.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 140304719
sender: gale@wind.hpc.pko.dec.com
references: <DMpy3E.6Lr@csc.liv.ac.uk> <4fu3vd$t0n@jeeves.usfca.edu>
organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
reply-to: gale@hpc.pko.dec.com
newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-02-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <4gajp4$6aj@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
ig25@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Thomas Koenig) writes: 

>  If you compare Fortran 95 with Ada 95, what obstacles to high
>  performance do you see in Ada?  

Fortran 95 fits naturally with HPF (High Performance Fortran), a set of
industry-standard extensions to enable execution in parallel across a
network.  Some Fortran 90/95 compilers already come with HPF.  Does Ada
have a standard parallel dialect?

-Israel Gale