From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ace3fca092a457cd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AW: To := Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG) References: <_afsi.14775$ax1.8291@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> From: development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de (Markus E.L. 2) Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 00:28:45 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) Cancel-Lock: sha1:h3SZrFqtEhwbo/8HJtuHSx+bVdo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.74.57.165 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1186093050 88.74.57.165 (3 Aug 2007 00:17:30 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1335 Date: 2007-08-03T00:28:45+02:00 List-Id: 'Colossus DOT Pike AT worldnet DOT att DOT net (anon)' wrote: > In , "Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)" writes: >>Anon, >> >>You seem to have a dogmatic attitude. > > -- --------------------------- -- > -- True programmers are that way! -- > -- --------------------------- -- True programmers aren't that way. True programmers go with the flow. >>There were several posts correcting your claim that there is a compiler >>bug, but you insisted. >> > > Did they, now! What I saw was opions with a few agumenting that it > should be legal or others trying to alter the Ada definitions. The post Actually you saw at least two references to the ARM with proof that your assertions where wrong. > -- I did not see the True RM rule aka RM 4.4 ( 7 ) -- > -- with it example RM 4.5 ( 17 ) until I happen to -- The examples are certainly instructive, but my idea is that they aren't normative. So I wouldn't rely on the examples (without understanding which rule apply to them). Regards -- Markus