From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6bc7c6cdb81b2e46 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.megapath.net!news.megapath.net.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 14:24:16 -0500 From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <1146705264.736575.281650@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Missing Search (..) Operation From Ada.Directories Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 14:24:40 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.32.209.38 X-Trace: sv3-H6xPuiIT0/MIx3Po7QK4hdlm24QPJ/OQywgkRnfgWQfHdVprFIeFs1u/p30uioPQLt7EBAPhxh3aKJW!5bU4rmJiWnrUivlnkW1TgbQK3xu2ptMgHahEKn0CjDpEytr54DZCEt93qKE2gZYKeRKbbF3rokvK X-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4073 Date: 2006-05-04T14:24:40-05:00 List-Id: "Anh Vo" wrote in message news:1146705264.736575.281650@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com... > Operation Search (...) defined in A.16 paragraph 26/2 of the ARM 2005 > is missing from GNAT under gcc-4.1.x (gcc-4.1-20060428) and gcc-4.2 > Stage 3 (gcc-4.2-20060429). The specification of this operation is > copied and shown here for convenience. > > procedure Search ( > Directory : in String; > Pattern : in String; > Filter : in Filter_Type := (others => True); > Process : not null access procedure ( > Directory_Entry : in Directory_Entry_Type)); > > Could any one know why? Thanks in advance for your insight. Probably because that was a relatively last-minute insertion into the package (it was added in February 2005), and as that was the only substantive change made in the last couple of years, it may have been overlooked. (It was missing from the Janus/Ada package until 10 seconds ago :-), so they're not the only ones to have missed it.) Randy.