From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public From: pcg@aber.ac.uk (Piercarlo Grandi) Subject: Re: What is wrong with OO ? Date: 1996/12/12 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 203713400 sender: pcg@osfb.aber.ac.uk references: <32A4659D.347A@shef.ac.uk> <32a5ceba.81462731@news.nstn.ca> <32a7ae3c.11882739@news.nstn.ca> <32AD05B0.6235@possibility.com> <32AE805D.4849@calfp.co.uk> organization: Prifysgol Cymru, Aberystwyth newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng Date: 1996-12-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >>> "nickle" == Nick Leaton writes: nickle> Piercarlo Grandi wrote: pcg> Perhaps the reverse: if the tools were really advanced, perhaps pcg> including a program generator (and despite claims to the contrary pcg> no such thing has been yet produced), then high level design pcg> activity would be almost all the project. nickle> Available now, called a programer. rmartin> In another case, I have worked with a client who had a bunch rmartin> of "architects" doing nothing but drawing pretty Booch rmartin> diagrams and then throwing them over the wall to a bunch of rmartin> programmers. The programmers hated the architects and rmartin> ignored what they produced. Unfortunately, no matter how intensely so many managers wishfully think so (note that I am implying that you are a ``suit'' or that you wishfully think so, just that such wishful thinking is common among them), programmers are not "tools", and often not even "really advanced" ones :-). That programmers are not tools is indeed the reason which explains Robert Martin's observation that tossing buble diagrams over the wall does not work.