From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a00006d3c4735d70 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-02 12:50:26 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 14:47:01 -0600 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: References: <3fe00b82.90228601@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <2u3auvogde8ktotlaq0ldiaska3g416gus@4ax.com> <20619edc.0312221020.3fd1b4ee@posting.google.com> <20619edc.0312222106.3b369547@posting.google.com> <45cs9hAbLc6$EAAx@phaedsys.demon.co.uk> <3fe9f0d7.104475725@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <5802069.JsgInS3tXa@linux1.krischik.com> <1072464162.325936@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1563361.SfB03k3vvC@linux1.krischik.com> <11LvOkBBXw7$EAJw@phaedsys.demon.co.uk> <3ff0687f.528387944@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <1086072.fFeiH4ICbz@linux1.krischik.com> <3ff18d4d.603356952@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <1731094.1f7Irsyk1h@linux1.krischik.com> <3ff1b8ef.614528516@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <3ff21255.637418757@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <3OCdnR1Hv5k2dG-iRVn-sw@comcast.com> <1072912432.529286@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <776Jb.30088$tY5.5319@nwrdny01.gnilink.net> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4047 Date: 2004-01-02T14:47:01-06:00 List-Id: "Hyman Rosen" wrote: > Robert A Duff wrote: > > I don't much like that "useful fiction". Seems more like a "strange > > confusion", to me. > > That fiction combines with the ability to overload on return type such > that you can have the same name (or literal) used as an enumerator for > multiple types, and the compiler figures out which one is meant from > context in most cases. It means that the ARM doesn't have to create a > separate rule allowing and explaining this. > > But you already know that, right? Bob better know that, or we'll have to revoke his language-lawyer license! :-) Randy.