From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f20f5dfbb5c26c12
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-04 11:18:22 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-06!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: discriminant in constraint must appear alone
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:16:53 -0600
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <vsv23tp41rj7a6@corp.supernews.com>
References: <bqiq1m$uis$00$1@news.t-online.com>
 <bqlj28$erv$07$1@news.t-online.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3132
Date: 2003-12-04T13:16:53-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Vincent Smeets" <No.Spam@T-Online.de> wrote in message
news:bqlj28$erv$07$1@news.t-online.com...
> The best solution would be a change in the language. Is there something
> foreseen for the new version of Ada?

No. This is one the issues that was throughly discussed during the Ada 95
design, and it was decided then that no change was appropriate. (This
restriction comes from Ada 83.) Nothing has changed since then, so there is
no reason to revisit the decision.

                 Randy.