From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fd9a8f91bb89a8d2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-19 12:14:52 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is it possible to build an Ada cross-compiler for an 8-bit embedded target now that gcc 3.X has support for Ada? Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:12:00 -0600 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: References: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2693 Date: 2003-11-19T14:12:00-06:00 List-Id: "Stephen Leake" wrote in message news:ubrr91g7a.fsf@nasa.gov... > Which is a consequence of good design. How many times has it caught an > exception generated by a runtime check? I would class those as "bugs", > even if they don't cause lots of downtime. Many times, tracable to 4 or 5 actual bugs (all fixed now). The point is that even bugs don't cause the program to fail or (worse) cause a security hole. Testing can never prove the absense of bugs; unless you're using SPARK, you have to assume there are still some in there. Randy.